EndNote vs. RefWorks vs. Zotero—A Comparison of Options for Managing Citations
Which citation tool is right for you? The comparision chart below highlights the main features and differences.
| EndNote | RefWorks | Zotero | |
| General | |||
| Access | Desktop client software & Web -Based |
Web-based | Desktop software that lives in Firefox web browser |
| Allows users to share citations | Via EndNote Web | Yes | No |
| Learning curve | Takes longer to learn and normally requires training |
Fairly quick to learn | Quick to learn |
| Where are my files stored | Locally to your computer | Hosted web server | Locally to your computer |
| Word processing integration |
Works with Word and with LaTex through BibTex |
Works with Word through Wrint-N-Cite feature and LaTex through BibTex |
Works with Word and Open Office and with LaTex through BibTex and Google Docs |
| Automatic import of publications list into Faculty Activity Report and Faculty Guide | Yes | Need to export publications list to EndNote | Need to export publications list to EndNote |
| Adding References | |||
| Import from online databases | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Import web pages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Import from RSS feeds | No | Yes | Yes |
| Import records from LOUIS Catalog | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Import citations from Brandeis Scholar | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Types of records you can import (PDF's, images, etc.) |
Good for organizing records for artilces and books, PDF's and other file types |
Good for organizing records for artilces and books. |
Books, artilces, patents and webpages. Can also store PDF's web screenshots files and images in records. You can make PDF's searchable by choosing to index them in the preferences menu. |
| Managing and maintaining a large citation library (1,000 records plus) | Not complex; EndNote is a good option for maintaining large citation libraries. | Not complex; RefWorks can be slightly more cumbersome for managing large libraries. |
More difficult; takes more time to sort duplicate records and to verify that the records are complete. |
| Output | |||
| How many output styles? | Over 1,000 | Over 500 | |
| Modify and create output styles? | Yes | Yes | No |
| Can you export your citation library to a different tool? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Strengths |
Good for organizing citations for long papers and theses. Good option for complex major research projects, becuase it offers the most options for customization and formatting. |
Web-based solution which allows you to access your files from the Internet and does not restrict access to a single workstation. Allows users to easily share lists of citations. Good for organizing citations for papers.
|
Simple to download records. Good for managing a variety of formats including web pages. Offers the most functionality in a free open-source product.
|
Description
Loading content... please wait





Loading content... please wait